More FM bluster ...

Watched FMQ's (in retrospect on the computer!) again this week ... not only was the First Minister up to his usual bluster and failure to give a straight answer - he even started actually 'asking questions' of some of the Opposition Group Leaders?

... not sure that's quite what was envisaged by those who wrote the Standing Orders for the Scottish Parliament? I'm sure they thought FMQ's was supposed to be about the Legislature holding the Government to account??

So ... following yet another half-hour of complete bluster and the total avoidance of giving answers to serious questions ... I am completely unsurprised at developments later this afternoon after FMQ's had finished.

This motion seems to have brought things to a head ... but personally, I think the Presiding Officer is secretly reading this blog ;-)

Whitewash?

The Standards Commission 'appears' to have now reported on the long-running "incontrovertible proof" saga ...

... hope the Lord Provost remembers that very public statement he made - back during the October Council Meeting - guaranteeing that the whole saga would come back before the Full Council after the Standards Commission had duly reported.

Should be on the agenda for the next Council Meeting on Thursday 5th February then??

+67% increase in schools revenue funding

There was a point during the December Council Meeting where the Convener of Education tried to claim that school revenue budgets had been reduced over recent previous years - she even went so far as to put it in black and white in a motion (not on CPOL yet - but it will be eventually I'm sure!) ... all related to item 10.11 on the agenda here.

... our side of the Chamber was pretty incredulous at such an insinuation - not just because its a pile-of-arrant-nonsense, but because its nothing short of a blatant mis-truth.

... and I've now unearthed the 2004 briefing note from Officers which confirms in black-and-white:

"The Education Budget
A budget breakdown for the past five years (Revenue and Capital) is enclosed. Key investments are as follows:

• Revenue has increased by 67% over the past 5 years
• Capital Investment over 5 years £301.96 million"

Yes - that's a 67% increase in Revenue Budget from 1999 through to 2004 ... given that Revenue Budgets CONTINUED TO GO UP in the following 3-years, then it is perfectly correct to state that revenue expenditure on schools increased by over 67% throughout the previous two Labour terms of office (1999-2007).

But hey, portraying a '+67% increase' as a 'reduction' is all part of a days work for the current Council Administration :-(

Frankly - I struggle to believe a word they say.

Credit Union support

I want to welcome a Scottish Government funding initiative ... yes, I know it's a shock ;-)

... seriously, as someone who, as I've mentioned before, is both a member of a local credit union (and the Co-operative Bank), I do very much welcome the announcement today to set up a £250,000 fund to help credit unions grow and weather the current global downturn.

I hope Edinburgh's Capital Credit Union gets their application in quickly ;-)

Flying statistics

Would really be something if the 'flying statistics' reported in today's Herald were due to a positive choice to stop using aircraft ...

... but, it does appear to be mostly down to economic circumstances?

Does therefore seem to me, that these figures will rise significantly again in due course until a really constructive alternative is offered - and yet, a truly high speed rail link between 'Edinburgh/Glasgow' and London seems as far away as ever :-(

Christmas trees everywhere!

As instructed - see all the details here - I, along with 100's of other residents in South West Edinburgh dutifully put my Christmas tree out for collection (and recycling) on Thursday 8th January ...

... don't know if anyone else has noticed, but there appears to have been NO collection of trees in South West Edinburgh on Thursday 8th January - and the local area now has dozens of trees blowing around all over the place (especially given the very high winds over the weekend).

If the Council website is correct, these trees will now lie around until this Thursday, and maybe even next??

There does appear to be a growing pattern of simple basics just not being attended to right across the city ... not good at all :-(

Con-trick appears to have worked?

Sadly, it appears my hope just yesterday that local Lib-Dems would have the guts to speak up about the low level of the so-called 'Capital City Supplement' has already been shattered :-(

Scotsman has a brief piece on all of this today - here - wherein:

The council's finance leader (who is a Lib-Dem) said: "We're not disappointed at all; this was broadly in line with what we expected. We will continue to argue for more, as we believe Edinburgh has a very strong case for additional support, but this is £3.5m more than we had last year and is certainly very welcome."

If its what was expected, why did we ask for ten-times that amount?

... and sorry, we received more money under the 'Cities Growth Fund'; and this is an overall funding reduction :-(

I despair, I really do :-((

New local food initiative?

Spotted that a very local (Shandon!) food initiative is being punted via a new (I think?) website ...

... sounds like a throughly sensible idea - maybe I should offer to provide some produce from the allotment ;-))

Capital City con-trick

I see its been 'unofficially' confirmed today - Evening News has the story here - that Edinburgh is to get some £3.5million per year as a 'Capital City Supplement' ...

... now, I don't blame the Nats for trying to portray this as a stunning success:

"An aide to Mr Swinney said: "For the first time, a Scottish budget is making provision for a capital city supplement."

i.e. this is the first time specific funding for the Capital is being provided ... problem is, its a lie.

Not only is it a lie, its also a lot less money than was provided under the previous Scottish Executive from 2004-2007 ... that funding was called the 'Cities Growth Fund', it no longer exists, and it gave Edinburgh £24.2million over three years. Just have a browse through some of these links:

• News Release announcing the fund
• the original full consultation paper
• the specific chapter on Edinburgh

Now, I'm not one to say no to £3.5million per year - I was entirely supportive of the current Lib/Nat Council Administration's efforts to extract a 'Capital City Supplement' from the SNP Scottish Government - problem is, this is an overall reduction in funding from previous Capital City programmes (such as the 'Cities Growth Fund').

It is another Scottish Government con-trick ... I can only hope, probably in vain, that senior Lib-Dems in Edinburgh's local Administration will have the political gumption to say so??

SFT a total failure

Forth Road Bridge again I'm afraid ... watched FMQ's this afternoon where the Bridge featured in questions and, acknowledging my own political bias, I think the whole FMQ process is becoming incredibly predictable in that the First Minister simply never answers a question :-(

... bluster, shouting, bit more bluster, then some raucous back-bench applause - becoming more and more like Westminster every week; which is rather tragic when you consider the present Scottish Government's view on the workings of Westminster :-((

Anyhow, back to the Bridge - absolutely no answers as to why the fabled Scottish Futures Trust (SFT) was supposedly 'good' for such a project, as confirmed by various Cabinet Secretaries (on numerous occasions) back in 2008, but now 'its not an appropriate vehicle for such a large project'?

The whole SFT saga now reeks to high heaven and its obvious to anyone that its becoming a complete farce ...

... it won't play any part whatsoever in funding a new Forth Crossing and much, much worse there is still as yet NOT ONE SINGLE NEW SCHOOL CONTRACT been initiated by the SNP Government since May 2007. It is a total failure.

All the FM bluster in the world can't hide that simple truth.

Allotment update

Been a while since I gave any update on the allotment :-(

... my better-half was down there today and we subsequently had brussel sprouts, leeks and spinach for our dinner this evening - all straight from the plot!

Only a few weeks now until the 1st anniversary of our tenancy ... and looks like we'll be cropping vegetables right up until that date :-)

London calling ...

Been down in London yesterday/today (still sticking to that no-flying pledge ... 2-years and counting now!) to catch up with some colleagues ...

... and it has to be said that London was actually MUCH colder than Edinburgh. Very strange?

Yet more funding fears ...

This story doesn't apply specifically to Edinburgh, but is sadly another example of the significant (and potentially very serious) flaws inherent within the whole "concordat/SOA" approach to the delivery of local services ...

... I know I've banged on about it all at length, but please do read this short BBC Scotland piece and tell me honestly that all is well with current arrangements?

No ... I'm afraid it's a microcosm of all that's gone wrong.

"The genius of evolution"

There is an absolutely fantastic four-part series on Radio 4 this week (running at 9am every morning) - all the details here - marking the 200th anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin ...

... if you've missed any so far this week, you can listen to all the programmes from the link above ;-)

Such a simple, yet startling idea for its time, and it has explained so much. Does anyone know of an idea that has a bigger ratio of 'what it explains' divided by 'what it assumes'?

I certainly don't.

"Schools to go greener" - except in Scotland's Capital City

Absolute classic of a News Release out today from the Scottish Government - see it here ...

... nothing wrong with the content whatsoever - indeed, the aspiration to "maximise the uptake by authorities of the UK Low Carbon Building Programme (LCBP) which provides 50 per cent funding for the installation costs of a range of renewable technologies" seems eminently sensible.

One slight problem when it comes to Edinburgh though - just have a look at the UK Low Carbon Building Programme (LCBP) web-site ... here and here ... then contrast it with what happened last year in our fair Capital City - here :-(

As I said at the time; "each and every Lib-Dem and Nationalist Councillor in Edinburgh should truly be ashamed if this decision goes ahead (to cancel Biomass Boilers in 7 schools). Weren't they being serious when they said that our environment had to be "protected for future generations"?

A truly shameful episode - all to save a bit of initial capital outlay ...

... and sadly, I still don't think the current crowd in charge really know that at times they just need to tell officers where to get off.

Too late now for those 7 schools though :-((

'Labour Council delivered for Edinburgh' claims current Lib-Dem Council Leader!

I mentioned yesterday how much I was looking forward to reading all my e-mails upon my return to work today ...

... well, the one I've enjoyed most is the 'New Year Message' from our dear Council Leader wherein she boldly proclaims:

"The Council, and its staff, has already proven its ability to deliver for Edinburgh. As Scotland's most improved urban authority we are leading the way in providing the services our residents want."

What she fails to mention is just what that claim is based upon - so I'll tell you instead:

• it comes from Audit Scotland, the public spending watchdog, who recently identified Edinburgh as Scotland's most improved urban council
• in fact, I blogged about it when the report came out in November 2008 - see here
• the actual Council report, which summarises all this can be found here, and paragraph 5.2 has the 'most improved urban authority' statement
• the whole assessment upon which this claim rests is contained within Appendices 1 and 2 of the report - PLEASE have a quick look at pages 6 through to 14 here
• you'll see the three years upon which the claim is based are;
• 2005/2006 - Labour in control, and Labour set the budget
• 2006/2007 - Labour in control, and Labour set the budget
• 2007/2008 - Lib/Nats in control, but Labour set the budget!

Totally outrageous - a politician taking the credit for something which they played no part in delivering ... indeed, they actually opposed all three budgets upon which this success is based.

I've never heard the like of it ;-)

London stole our bridge?

I sadly thought this would happen :-(

... and mentioned such at the start of last month - see here (read past the 'Glasgow trams shocker'!) ...

My one and only New Year prediction is that 2009 will see lots and lots more of this nonsense ...

... blaming London for just about everything seems to be the current favourite political pastime of the Scottish Government, alongside promoting the "Year of Homecoming" :-(

Welcome to modern Scotland :-((

Happy New Year!

Well, I have survived the traditional family-Christmas (just!), and am now safely back in sunny Edinburgh after a few days up in Aviemore to celebrate Hogmanay ... a very similar trip to last year, but much, much more snow this time around :-)

Believe it or not, this is Loch Morlich (above) - totally frozen and with a fresh covering of snow!

Four families braved Aviemore Youth Hostel this time around ... 8 adults and 8 kids in total ... and a good time was had by all.

Cairngorm Reindeer Herd was a firm favourite with the older kids, and some of the adults managed a bit of winter walking again ... but just look at those conditions :-))

2009 can only get better ... surely?

... once again, definitely a case of "back to work for a rest"!

... I am so looking forward to getting back to all those e-mails tomorrow :-(