data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98f3e/98f3e7be6700b466fa550b57436e3168309cde46" alt=""
Planning to stay until quite late Sunday, so blogging could be pretty light until then :-(
(ex) CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCILLOR, ANDREW BURNS; FOUNTAINBRIDGE/CRAIGLOCKHART WARD 'EDINBURGH LABOUR GROUP' LEADER; & 'THE CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL' LEADER. --- just very brief comments (both work & personal), as often as possible, that's all :-)
- and no, no matter who requests it, I will not be undertaking a preferential voting exercise on who was the most effective Minister ;-))
Oh well, no need to worry ... after all, it is only the future constitutional status of our nation that's at stake over the coming months.
Plenty of time to raise the quality of debate before that pesky referendum eh?
... you do have to wonder :-((
Now then, just look at the Month 3 (yes, only Month 3!) financial figures for the Council's two largest Departments (you'd better sit down first, if you have a weak constitution) ...
In both of these Departments, further significant management actions (code for yet more front-line services cuts?) are now being employed to bring these budgets into line.
Financial competence?
Sadly, as I've said before, this is NOT now a Council which is 'service-driven' ...
... but the mechanistic-approach adopted last February - one of "knowing the cost of everything but the value of nothing" - also now appears to be failing miserably.
Not good for Edinburgh, not good at all.
But, much more serious than the LP using his casting vote to prevent progress on items such as those above (important though both are in their own right obviously) is the ever-creeping, and blatant, politicisation of the LP's position.
At the meeting (and anyone present will confirm this I'm sure) there was a woeful use of Standing Order 22 (see page 11 here) which stops a decision of the Council being changed within 12-months.
The LP has used it frequently to prevent us discussing issues such as school meals, and he used it during this month's meeting to prevent the Council discussing the Fairer Scotland Fund (see item 10.1 here) ... all these topics are just too embarrassing for the current Lib/Nat Pact, you see :-(
... but not Post Offices - no, that's not too embarrassing because the whole Post Office Agenda is being led by a tier of Government within which they have no power or control.
Now, the fact that we've discussed, and made significant decisions, on Post Offices at Council Meetings in both May 2008 and June 2008 was quickly swept under the carpet and Standing Order 22 (despite my request for it to be applied consistently!) was ignored when it came to discussion of an 'emergency motion' on Post Offices.
Shameful.
Mind you, such a sum seems paltry when compared to:
There may well be a time for such expenditure, but this year isn't it :-((