data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71535/7153568e63848609d39bfb198299caa52416094f" alt=""
Of course, the Councillor-members of the Committee may overturn that recommendation; but that's not a very common occurrence.
I think it does now throw the spotlight back onto the owners of the land in question (not the Local Authority, I hasten to add!) to look seriously at other potential uses ... the report, which refuses this application, makes specific mention of this current proposal not being for a "community purpose" - a subtle hint to what may be acceptable in the future I feel?
No comments:
Post a Comment