When are Community High Schools not community high schools ... well, maybe if they lose control of all their community facilities?
This report was up at Education Committee on Monday - I mentioned it briefly in an earlier post - and has now led to these significant concerns gaining some traction in the local press.
I am entirely confident that this is not the last you will hear of this issue!
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Wednesday, December 09, 2009
Pre- Budget Report
Pre- Budget Report this afternoon - missed the main speeches as didn't have access to a computer at 12.30pm :-(
... good analysis though on the main BBC web-site and journalist blogs!
... good analysis though on the main BBC web-site and journalist blogs!
Tuesday, December 08, 2009
Health and Social Care Committee
It's been a very busy 7-days, and I do have several draft posts to complete - so will try and keep my points brief ... and apologies to my regular readers who have been complaining about my lack of blogging activity :-(
Health and Social Care Committee this morning (Tuesday) - was substituting for my colleague Ewan Aitken. A couple of reports were referred to Full Council (coming up next Thursday, 17th December) ... one being the report at item 16 on the agenda, concerning Home Care Modernisation.
Key paragraph is 2.2 where it clearly states that the public/private split of care provision is to be moved towards 33%/66%, and the third of the 'market' for the public sector would be all those with 'complex needs'?
... needless to say, there is no analysis within the report about which type of provision consistently performs better in any client-surveys for levels of satisfaction? Strange that :-(
Health and Social Care Committee this morning (Tuesday) - was substituting for my colleague Ewan Aitken. A couple of reports were referred to Full Council (coming up next Thursday, 17th December) ... one being the report at item 16 on the agenda, concerning Home Care Modernisation.
Key paragraph is 2.2 where it clearly states that the public/private split of care provision is to be moved towards 33%/66%, and the third of the 'market' for the public sector would be all those with 'complex needs'?
... needless to say, there is no analysis within the report about which type of provision consistently performs better in any client-surveys for levels of satisfaction? Strange that :-(
Monday, December 07, 2009
That weird 25% rule
Remember that weird 25% rule which looks like it has saved a flawed tendering process from being nodded through Committee ...
... well today at the Education, Children and Families Committee - having learned their lesson about the importance of decent scrutiny? - the Nat/Lib Administration completely ignored Labour and Green concerns about a report on facilities at Community High Schools and refused my colleague Councillor Henderson's perfectly reasonable request to refer the report to December's Full Council Meeting on the 17th :-(
They can do this at the Education, Children and Families Committee because the presence of non-aligned (Church and Teacher representatives) means that Labour and Greens alone don't make up 25% of the Committee - this is the only Council Committee where that occurs.
Well - here's a prediction ... I'll be careful with my language ...there were some very clear terminological inexactitudes in that report approved today; Councillor Henderson politely pointed the issues out and was impolitely ignored; this will all come back to haunt the Administration and they'll be regretting (again) their inability to listen to reasonable requests for clarification and further information.
More to follow on this for sure.
... well today at the Education, Children and Families Committee - having learned their lesson about the importance of decent scrutiny? - the Nat/Lib Administration completely ignored Labour and Green concerns about a report on facilities at Community High Schools and refused my colleague Councillor Henderson's perfectly reasonable request to refer the report to December's Full Council Meeting on the 17th :-(
They can do this at the Education, Children and Families Committee because the presence of non-aligned (Church and Teacher representatives) means that Labour and Greens alone don't make up 25% of the Committee - this is the only Council Committee where that occurs.
Well - here's a prediction ... I'll be careful with my language ...there were some very clear terminological inexactitudes in that report approved today; Councillor Henderson politely pointed the issues out and was impolitely ignored; this will all come back to haunt the Administration and they'll be regretting (again) their inability to listen to reasonable requests for clarification and further information.
More to follow on this for sure.
Saturday, December 05, 2009
Woe is me ...
My middle name is Douglas ...... I could really have done with an extra £220,000 just before Christmas :-(
Edinburgh-bound
Edinburgh-bound on the East Coast mainline (can't believe they've re-branded all the trains??), following a lengthy set of ERS meetings ...... juniors' 12th Birthday tomorrow - 8 X 12-year old boys round for a house-Party in the afternoon! I may need to retreat to work for some serious recuperation on Monday ;-)
Thursday, December 03, 2009
PR referendum?
Well, off down south for a couple of days - so blogging may be a bit light ...... various Electoral Reform Society (ERS) events/meetings to attend and bound to be significant debate around the latest moves on a potential referendum on the UK electoral system.
Of course, straight AV (the alternative vote) is not proportional - but if the Constitutional Reform Bill is to be amended in order to get rid of FPTP (first past the post), by a system that uses preferential voting (AV), is it really impossible that the Bill could be amended just a bit further to preferential voting in multi-member wards (STV)?
... or amended to seek preferential voting for all elections - local (English and Welsh) and Lords, as well as Westminster?
... unlikely - maybe?
But not impossible.
Coalition as safe as houses?
What can I say ... so the current coalition is as safe as houses, and they disagree on nothing but trams?
... well, you can believe that if you like - I know what I believe, and I also know what's being actively discussed within the City Chambers.
... well, you can believe that if you like - I know what I believe, and I also know what's being actively discussed within the City Chambers.
Care and Support services tender update
Well, it was a pretty quick meeting this morning ... the Convener read out a pre-prepared statement announcing the independent investigation (as we thought) and then indicated that there would be no questions taken :-(
Reading out a pre-prepared statement I can accept - this whole process is in such a mess, it makes sense to be careful about what is now said by those in charge politically ... especially after his colleagues' words yesterday:
"I have said all along that we have a good robust tendering process that has been cleared by the lawyers at every stage."
But - why questions weren't allowed to the Officers in charge, I just don't understand? There are many immediate queries that it would have been good for clients and their carers to have had answers to - and many of them were in the room this morning.
But the whole process is now, in effect, on hold until Thursday 21st January 2010 whilst the investigation takes place.
We'll be doing everything in our power to ensure that whoever undertakes that investigation has all the relevant facts --- and some of them do not make pleasant reading.
And, in due course, those responsible for this whole affair must answer for their actions.
Reading out a pre-prepared statement I can accept - this whole process is in such a mess, it makes sense to be careful about what is now said by those in charge politically ... especially after his colleagues' words yesterday:
"I have said all along that we have a good robust tendering process that has been cleared by the lawyers at every stage."
But - why questions weren't allowed to the Officers in charge, I just don't understand? There are many immediate queries that it would have been good for clients and their carers to have had answers to - and many of them were in the room this morning.
But the whole process is now, in effect, on hold until Thursday 21st January 2010 whilst the investigation takes place.
We'll be doing everything in our power to ensure that whoever undertakes that investigation has all the relevant facts --- and some of them do not make pleasant reading.
And, in due course, those responsible for this whole affair must answer for their actions.
Wednesday, December 02, 2009
Serious questions now need answered
I'll undoubtedly post more about this whole saga in due course ...
... but needless to say - I am bound to point out that without significant public pressure, and some concerted action from the Opposition Group/s, then this whole process would have been approved way back at the Finance and Resources Committee on 27th October :-(
If ever a case was needed to show that the current 'political scrutiny structures' at the Council are simply not fit-for-purpose, then this is it.
Thank goodness for some old-fashioned student stunts, is all I can say!
Frankly, Councillor Paul Edie has some very serious questions to answer - just today in the local paper he is quoted thus:
"I have said all along that we have a good robust tendering process that has been cleared by the lawyers at every stage."
Really??
... but needless to say - I am bound to point out that without significant public pressure, and some concerted action from the Opposition Group/s, then this whole process would have been approved way back at the Finance and Resources Committee on 27th October :-(
If ever a case was needed to show that the current 'political scrutiny structures' at the Council are simply not fit-for-purpose, then this is it.
Thank goodness for some old-fashioned student stunts, is all I can say!
Frankly, Councillor Paul Edie has some very serious questions to answer - just today in the local paper he is quoted thus:
"I have said all along that we have a good robust tendering process that has been cleared by the lawyers at every stage."
Really??
An independent investigation ordered into 'Care and Support Services' tendering
Significant developments with the Care and Support Services tender early this evening ...
I'll simply re-produce the relevant text/News Releases below:
=====================================
Please forgive the impersonal nature of this update
Contracts for the provision of Care and Support Services
We've just learned, very late this afternoon, that the Council's Chief Executive is postponing any award of the Care and Support Services contracts. An independent investigation is being launched into the whole process, which will report back to the Council in January 2010.
The special meeting of the Finance and Resources Committee will still go ahead tomorrow, but it will simply last a few minutes and the Convener will announce the intention to postpone award of contracts pending an independent investigation.
Our Group's reaction to this whole situation follows immediately below, thereafter a copy of the News Release from the Chief Executive's office.
I hope this information is all of some assistance - please don't hesitate to get back to us if you need any clarification.
--- and, once again, many thanks for all your efforts in keeping this process in the political spotlight.
Andrew
=========================================
News Release from Edinburgh Labour
For immediate release
Burns and Hinds welcomes postponement of Care Contracts
Edinburgh Labour's Group Leader, Andrew Burns, and Spokesperson for Health and Social Care, Lesley Hinds, today welcomed the fact that the Chief Executive of the City of Edinburgh Council has intervened directly on the issue of the Care and Support Services tender and that at tomorrow's meeting of the Finance and Resources Committee the award of these contracts is to be postponed.
Councillor Hinds commented:
“The Labour Group has been asking questions in relation to this whole process for many, many months now and has consistently voiced serious concerns about how the tendering has been managed.
I would like to thank all the individuals and organisations who have contacted their local Councillor, and raised this issue with them, over recent weeks. That direct lobbying has helped keep this process under proper scrutiny."
Councillor Burns added:
"Many service users and their carers are, however, still in a state of uncertainty and anxiety and the Convener of Health and Social Care, Councillor Paul Edie, now needs to tell us how he personally intends to sort this out as quickly as possible.”
Ends
============================================
FINAL DRAFT OF CEC NEWS RELEASE
from Chief Executive's Office
The following is a statement from City of Edinburgh Council Leader Jenny Dawe.
She said: “I recognise the importance of the Care and Support Services Tender to vulnerable people in the city and have insisted that all aspects of the tendering process must be robust. I have been in regular touch with senior council officials on this and have just been advised that there remain a number of outstanding issues surrounding the Care and Support Services Tender. As a result, I have instructed the Chief Executive to have the tenders independently evaluated.
“The specially convened Finance and Resources Committee will meet tomorrow when the Convener intends to adjourn the meeting to allow officers to provide an updated report in January.
“On behalf of the Administration, I would like to reassure service users there will be no interruption to their current care and support arrangements, pending a decision in January. Direct Payment applications will continue to be processed as previously agreed.
“We are determined to ensure the integrity of the tender process and believe an independent evaluation is the best way to achieve this.”
=======================================
I'll simply re-produce the relevant text/News Releases below:
=====================================
Please forgive the impersonal nature of this update
Contracts for the provision of Care and Support Services
We've just learned, very late this afternoon, that the Council's Chief Executive is postponing any award of the Care and Support Services contracts. An independent investigation is being launched into the whole process, which will report back to the Council in January 2010.
The special meeting of the Finance and Resources Committee will still go ahead tomorrow, but it will simply last a few minutes and the Convener will announce the intention to postpone award of contracts pending an independent investigation.
Our Group's reaction to this whole situation follows immediately below, thereafter a copy of the News Release from the Chief Executive's office.
I hope this information is all of some assistance - please don't hesitate to get back to us if you need any clarification.
--- and, once again, many thanks for all your efforts in keeping this process in the political spotlight.
Andrew
=========================================
News Release from Edinburgh Labour
For immediate release
Burns and Hinds welcomes postponement of Care Contracts
Edinburgh Labour's Group Leader, Andrew Burns, and Spokesperson for Health and Social Care, Lesley Hinds, today welcomed the fact that the Chief Executive of the City of Edinburgh Council has intervened directly on the issue of the Care and Support Services tender and that at tomorrow's meeting of the Finance and Resources Committee the award of these contracts is to be postponed.
Councillor Hinds commented:
“The Labour Group has been asking questions in relation to this whole process for many, many months now and has consistently voiced serious concerns about how the tendering has been managed.
I would like to thank all the individuals and organisations who have contacted their local Councillor, and raised this issue with them, over recent weeks. That direct lobbying has helped keep this process under proper scrutiny."
Councillor Burns added:
"Many service users and their carers are, however, still in a state of uncertainty and anxiety and the Convener of Health and Social Care, Councillor Paul Edie, now needs to tell us how he personally intends to sort this out as quickly as possible.”
Ends
============================================
FINAL DRAFT OF CEC NEWS RELEASE
from Chief Executive's Office
The following is a statement from City of Edinburgh Council Leader Jenny Dawe.
She said: “I recognise the importance of the Care and Support Services Tender to vulnerable people in the city and have insisted that all aspects of the tendering process must be robust. I have been in regular touch with senior council officials on this and have just been advised that there remain a number of outstanding issues surrounding the Care and Support Services Tender. As a result, I have instructed the Chief Executive to have the tenders independently evaluated.
“The specially convened Finance and Resources Committee will meet tomorrow when the Convener intends to adjourn the meeting to allow officers to provide an updated report in January.
“On behalf of the Administration, I would like to reassure service users there will be no interruption to their current care and support arrangements, pending a decision in January. Direct Payment applications will continue to be processed as previously agreed.
“We are determined to ensure the integrity of the tender process and believe an independent evaluation is the best way to achieve this.”
=======================================
Labour re-shuffle?
Been thinking a bit more about the recent demise of the Education Secretary ...
... and with obvious apologies to Rhona Brankin; it is a fact that Des McNulty has been in his current shadow post little more than a month and appears to have dislodged his opposite number??
... wonder if Iain Gray should consider moving him to another shadow portfolio very soon ;-)
... and with obvious apologies to Rhona Brankin; it is a fact that Des McNulty has been in his current shadow post little more than a month and appears to have dislodged his opposite number??
... wonder if Iain Gray should consider moving him to another shadow portfolio very soon ;-)
Tuesday, December 01, 2009
SNP to leave local coalition?
I'm generally pretty careful about what I put up on the blog, and only post about certain issues when I'm entirely convinced they are true:- like the aborted plans to bring back Councillor's robes
- like the (unfortunately) enacted plans for traffic lights in the City Chambers
- and like the incredibly mistaken plans to ignore all the public anxiety over the tendering of Care and Support Services
- I give these as just a few examples.
Well, tonight, it appears that the SNP locally are actively planning to walk away from the Nat/Lib Coalition, that currently runs Edinburgh Council, within the next 18-months and certainly before the May 2011 Scottish Parliament elections ...
... the rationale is clear, if not twisted --- get out and blame all the ills-of-Edinburgh on the Lib-Dems before the national poll in May 2011; and hopefully thereafter bolster their collective position for that year's election-day, and the following May 2012 Local Government elections.
Never mind the Nats' role in everything up until then --- the plan is simply to just walk away and leave the hapless Lib-Dems carrying the can for the lot?
A Coalition Partnership "founded on the democratic principles of trust, equity, openness and fairness" ... I humbly suggest not :-(
Simply not listening!
Well, tragically, it appears the rumours earlier this morning about the Nat/Lib Administration basically pressing ahead with the Care and Support tenders - with the associated, and previously published, Direct Payment rates - appear to be 100% true :-(The report/s for Thursday's special Finance and Resources Committee meeting are now up on CPOL - the main report can be found here, with the appendices here ...
... and despite numerous pages, full of numerous warm-words, the final recommendations are not significantly different from the Council Meeting on the 19th November :-(
I sense the rate of Direct Payment applications may now increase even further in the next couple of days before the 3rd December deadline.
Very, very disappointing ... and clearly those in charge are quite simply not listening :-((
Cabinet re-shuffle ... at last
The Scottish blogosphere is awash today with re-shuffle mania ...
... and whilst clearly the First Minister didn't pay any attention to my earlier post back in February ;-)
... I think he has taken the right action today in changing his Education Minister. I've got absolutely no axe-to-grind with Fiona Hyslop as an individual, but the SNP's education policy is a complete mess (few would deny it!) and it does indeed need some fresh thinking.
Time will tell if the right man has got the job - if he starts arguing for the concordat and the accompanying SOA processes to be scrapped (they are at the root of all these problems), then he'll get my support!
... mind you, I won't be putting any money on it just yet :-(
... and whilst clearly the First Minister didn't pay any attention to my earlier post back in February ;-)
... I think he has taken the right action today in changing his Education Minister. I've got absolutely no axe-to-grind with Fiona Hyslop as an individual, but the SNP's education policy is a complete mess (few would deny it!) and it does indeed need some fresh thinking.
Time will tell if the right man has got the job - if he starts arguing for the concordat and the accompanying SOA processes to be scrapped (they are at the root of all these problems), then he'll get my support!
... mind you, I won't be putting any money on it just yet :-(
Doing the wrong thing?
Well, it's just City Chambers gossip (but you do know that's usually correct!) at the moment ...
... but word is that the Nat/Lib Administration are to press ahead on Thursday with the Care and Support Services tendering exercise, and to pretty much ignore the previous Council-agreed Amendment?
If that happens, I think it's safe to predict a high number of the City's most vulnerable people, and their carers, will be hugely disappointed and quite rightly angry.
Ignoring the strength of feeling on this issue (never mind the will of the Council?) would be a monumental mistake, which will continue to haunt this Administration if they really do choose that course of action in a couple of days time.
... but word is that the Nat/Lib Administration are to press ahead on Thursday with the Care and Support Services tendering exercise, and to pretty much ignore the previous Council-agreed Amendment?
If that happens, I think it's safe to predict a high number of the City's most vulnerable people, and their carers, will be hugely disappointed and quite rightly angry.
Ignoring the strength of feeling on this issue (never mind the will of the Council?) would be a monumental mistake, which will continue to haunt this Administration if they really do choose that course of action in a couple of days time.
Monday, November 30, 2009
Damp squib?
I've now read through (sad I know) the Scottish Government's White Paper - "Your Scotland, Your Voice" that was launched earlier this morning ...
... personally, I do think that unless there is a huge improvement in clarity about what is actually being proposed between now and the publication of the promised 'referendum bill', then this whole process will indeed be consigned to the proverbial dustbin by Holyrood.
As things stand today - it is simply not clear to me: exactly how many options will be on any ballot paper; what those options will actually consist of as regards specific powers; and indeed how any eventual multi-option referendum votes would be counted --- all fairly fundamental stuff that is simply missing?
Damp squib is the polite summary, the SNP have - unfortunately for them - made the 'White Paper: White Elephant' jibe most likely to stick.
... personally, I do think that unless there is a huge improvement in clarity about what is actually being proposed between now and the publication of the promised 'referendum bill', then this whole process will indeed be consigned to the proverbial dustbin by Holyrood.
As things stand today - it is simply not clear to me: exactly how many options will be on any ballot paper; what those options will actually consist of as regards specific powers; and indeed how any eventual multi-option referendum votes would be counted --- all fairly fundamental stuff that is simply missing?
Damp squib is the polite summary, the SNP have - unfortunately for them - made the 'White Paper: White Elephant' jibe most likely to stick.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)